This friday I went to Boston (YOUHOU) it was fun and everything but I'd like to share a conversation I had on the way back.
I was reading an article in Newsweek called "
Abortion wars gets technical..." (p39 if you want to see it)
Someone bent over me and says "@#$%@#&*%#$" showing me that quote:
"
The [new] law requires physicians[..] to read [to the patient] that she is about to "terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being".
I was surprised by this reaction, I ask him which part of the quote he disagrees with and we come to the interesting point where I have to ask this amazed question:
"
But if IT is not human, what is it?"
Yep, I had to ask that question, obviously I missed the part where we are not human before we are born, some magical DNA transformation must occur between day 1 and week 30 something,
or maybe it's the woman's vigina who clothes you with humanity...
Hold on, then how about C-section babies?
I don't know I must have missed something in biology class...
So how do you define a human being?
What makes us biologically human, if it's not DNA?
Anonymous: " I think human life starts when the heart beats, it's been this definition for a thousand years in many cultures"
Me: "... (surprised that for once this person totally ignores the DNA discoveries of this past decade, I mean century...) ok let's say human life begins when there is a heart beat (week 3?) then what is it before?
- I don't know.. it's animal.."
It's animal.
Well let me hope that my future foetuses won't get stuck in the doggy stage, I get really scared when they bark..
Ok this answer was slightly upset. But why should he be upset about that discussion?
My problem is that people who usually quote scientific research 5 times a day suddently ignore science facts when it comes to abortion questions, like an unborn embryo has a separate, unique set of DNA and only needs time and nutrients to develop.
Because it would imply too much to just admit that embryo are human lifes.
That would mean abortion terminates a human life.
That might even be wrong.
I'm fed up with the religious war (and I've been here only a year!). This has nothing to do with religion. It's science!
A baby is human, it doesn't become human with his first take of oxygene through lungs, it was human in the womb. It doesn't become human the day the mother says " I will keep IT". I'm sorry but this is not how it works. It's disturbing, I know, I've been there. Where you realize abortion is killing someone in the process of sending a woman "back to her life, just like before". Well no, now she is the mother of a dead foetus, and he died on her choice.
Some part of the above-quoted conversation was about me being biased because I'm catholic and I believe there is a soul for the baby before he exists.
Well even if you want to argue in theological field, there is no soul before there is a body. Human being are so precious because they have a body to express their person. We are no angel, every body knows it ;)
I mean this is so important whenever you have to ask the question: " what makes us human?" in front of a situation, that usually means something is wrong.
Well maybe there is some catholicism in thinking that human beings are worth giving it a try. They should all get a chance to live in decent condition.
Well hold on, if I ever become american I won't need to be catholic to agree with that, it's the first lines of your constitution!!
But there is no catholicism involve in the definition of a human being. It's a fact.